Truth Talks are apart of the TruthGroup which also owns the fast growing censor social media platform, Truthbook.social

Categories
Health

Nanobots That Release Toxins And Harvest Energy From the Body

Nanobots That Release Toxins And Harvest Energy From the Body

By The General

WATCH: Nanobots That Release Toxins And Harvest Energy From the Body

Click Here To Play the Video

——————–

Original source: https://t.me/GeneralMCNews/8295

Categories
Health

The Employment Relations Authority Demand the Takedown of all of NZ Health Whistleblower Barry Young’s Content, Otherwise they are Threatening Liz Gunn, FreeNZ & NZ Loyal with 3 Months in Prison, Huge Fines and Losing all of Their Equipment!

The Employment Relations Authority Demand the Takedown of all of NZ Health Whistleblower Barry Young’s Content, Otherwise they are Threatening Liz Gunn, FreeNZ & NZ Loyal with 3 Months in Prison, Huge Fines, and Losing all of Their Equipment!

By FreeNZ Media

They Are Censoring & Silencing Us

 

The employment relations authority demand the takedown of all of Barry Young’s content on our platform, otherwise they are threatening Liz Gunn, FreeNZ & NZ Loyal with 3 months in prison, huge fines and losing all of our equipment!

Censorship and Tyranny is alive and well in NZ . .

Here’s what others had to say:

renegadeheart
My advice to anyone reading this, download and back up all videos on Barry Young and the data leak from the FreeNZ portals / Twitter. The governments Nazi sympathisers want the evidence scrubbed. Search “YouTube downloader”, “Rumble downloader”, Twitter downloader”

N0dr0g
It seems that Liz Gunn is now under the spotlight of our corrupt government and their minions. Sad to say that Liz is getting hammered on more than one front by the system. We now have quite a line-up of people who have been targeted in this way. Don’t be intimidated NZ, this is bad but expected.
The Beehive is at war with the people of New Zealand. They have yet again attacked us and those we hold dear, using ‘law-fare’ in this case.

TAJ42
NZ has gone, I cannot recognize our country anymore. Free speech, democracy.

adudley12
This is a worldwide depopulation event, created and brought to us by our corrupted/bought-off/blackmailed governments. No truth, No investigation will be allowed. Please Wake Up – Please REACT appropriately

adudley12
In the past, communist have had no issues murdering us by the tens of millions – usually by starvation, an event that is currently unfolding around the world as I speak, not withstanding the kill shot that they have mandated on billions of people.

standupforyourrights
Shame on Simpson Grierson! yet again another New Zealand Business putting money before truth and health of people, just like the MSM. Breaks my heart how our Politicians, our Judges and especially our Police Force are so brain washed they happily or ignorantly are ushering in Communism/Fabian Socialism which only ends in dictatorship, all doing the bidding of the maniac criminals running the WEF and UN, and WHO <- who all love CCP!! Or are they just simply still loyal to comrade Jacinda! Either way to bully and silence those speaking out is their only tool in the sandpit as they can’t have a mature, debate, conversation when the truth is not on their side. So ashamed of these people, none of them are what I class as brothers in arms – they are all traitors to a failed ideology and greed!!! Anzac in a week – they have no right to show their weakling faces at any dawn parade!!!

chiro153
You are our real New Zealand Leader Liz! To hell with Simpson Greer, they are not representing justice or law, only acting criminally for The Mafia in our beehive today.
Luxon is yet another conman and disgrace to New Zealanders.
Do what you have to and stay free, we don’t want you jailed you’re too precious to us all!
Love from Southland!

FeeSef
Time for the military to step in…Enough is Enough!!!
For the jabs to be still getting pushed daily (given all the findings and deaths of this bio weapon) is even more criminal than the original Biggest CRIME Against the Human Species!!

jdavincent
We are so much closer to waking up the majority, it is happening. Evident by these latest desperate moves. The system is compromised, but the general people are not. Know you have our support. BTC may help with funding issue

—————————-

Original source: https://rumble.com/v4q2u7n-they-are-censoring-and-silencing-us.html

Categories
Health

Expert Validates Survey Analysis: Vaccines ARE the Main Cause of Chronic Diseases

Expert Validates Survey Analysis: Vaccines ARE the Main Cause of Chronic Diseases

By STEVE KIRSCH

Confirmed: vaccines are a public health disaster because they are the #1 cause of chronic disease. When will the medical community admit their error?

Executive summary

Pretty much all mainstream statisticians, data scientists, and epidemiologists ignore my work.

But not all. I recently got an email from a college professor of mathematics who decided to do a more detailed analysis to see if my recent survey was accurately reflecting reality.

His conclusion: Yes, the survey results are very convincing and we have a very serious problem. The survey results which implicate the vaccines as the primary cause of chronic disease cannot be “explained away” as “biased” or “confounded.”

This is likely why I was unable to get a qualified epidemiologist, statistician, data scientist, or mathematician to challenge me on my results in a public forum.

The whole vaccine schedule is a healthcare disaster and nobody wants to talk about it.

The survey data

This article describes the survey and my conclusions.

Switkay’s analysis

Professor Hal Switkay’s analysis can be downloaded here (clicking the link will download the excel spreadsheet).

Summary of the approach used by Professor Switkay

In my initial analysis of the survey data, I looked at the odds at the extreme points (no vax vs. fully vaxxed) to compute an odds ratio.

What Professor Switkay did was to look at all the intermediate data points in the survey and check for a dose-response relationship that would be consistent with a causality hypothesis.

So instead of looking at two data points per condition (the odds for unvaxxed and vaxxed), he looked at all 5 data points (since there were 5 different vax levels in the survey: no, low, medium, high, very high) and then fit a line through them.

For each condition, he did a regression analysis on the log of the odds and computed the value for the Pearson correlation coefficient (aka “r”), t statistic, slope of the line through the points (an indicator of the effect size), and more.

If vaccines are causing a condition in a linear fashion, plotting the log odds should be a straight line. In short, if the log of the odds is a straight line, it means that if you double the dose, you double the response.

He found that indeed, the log odds lined up in a straight line and the “fit” of the line to the points was amazing for many of the conditions. An r value of .97 for example is something you rarely see in real world data. It’s basically “nearly perfectly correlated.”

Depression had r=.99 and t statistic=12.4.

Sexual orientation issues had r=.97 and t statistic=7.4.

These are simply stunning effects that didn’t happen by chance; they happen because vaccines are causing them.

That the medical community has never made the obvious connection is appalling.

That an MIT electrical engineer is discovering the unassailable evidence of the connection is even more embarrassing.

Summary of Professor Switkay’s results

Here is a screen shot of the key outcomes. It is ordered by slope of the regression line which is proportional to the strength of the effect.

In general, a t statistic of 2 or more will be very statistically significant. An r value of <.3 is considered weak, >.3 is moderate, and >.5 is considered strong.

Professor Switkay’s comments to me

Hello, Steve and Wayne. I have worked on Steve’s spreadsheet linked in a Substack today:

The data is at this link: https://www.skirsch.com/covid/Vaxxed_unvaxxed.xlsx

I didn’t think it was enough to compare only the highest vaxxed and lowest vaxxed cohorts, overlooking the middle of the sample and population. Instead, I regressed the log odds of adverse events against the logit vax incidence in each of the 5 vax cohorts.

Notice that there are 3 people who claim to have COVID vax injuries while being completely unvaxxed. Instead, I call that cohort very low vaxxed: vax incidence 0-10%. Then I use the midpoints of the vax incidence bins as reference points: 0.05, 0.175, 0.5, 0.825, 0.95, and compute the logits. These are the calculations in columns T-X. Column Z shows sparklines.

Column AA computes the correlations r. Column AB is the corresponding t-statistic: r*sqrt(n-2)/sqrt(1-r^2). In our case, n = 5 (5 ordered pairs on each row, for the 5 cohorts). t is distributed with 3 degrees of freedom.

Column AC has the p-values. The lowest p-values are associated with depression; sexual orientation issues; bleeding in the brain; and bipolar disease. Three of the top four are neuro-psych issues; the other is craniovascular. I’m surprised you didn’t ask about anxiety as well.

Columns AD and AE refer to my earlier work, “The Significance of Statistical Significance”: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/348020549_The_Significance_of_Statistical_Significance

There I argue that the threshold alpha for statistical significance should not automatically be 0.05, but rather 2/(n+1), where n is the sample size. I may have miscalculated this fraction on this spreadsheet. You could argue that n = 5, since there are 5 cohorts on each row, and the regression line is based on 5 ordered pairs. If so, then most rows achieve statistical significance, because their p-values are less than 2/(5+1) = 1/3.

I would love to see the ages of the participants. As someone born in 1960, I had the basic core of early vaccines, with an annual flu shot. Now I am a professor, and my students are becoming more and more fragile each year. I had a hunch it was due to the explosion in the vaccine schedule, and you may have revealed the connection for the world to see.

Please let me know if I can help any further. All the best –

Second email

Good morning, Steve. I read your four messages, so I am replying to the most recent one.

Thanks for setting the record straight; you did indeed include tons of other data that I did not study in my initial reply.

Nothing in your analysis strikes me as incorrect.

Having said that, I suspect that a reviewer looking at your analysis would say that the results were “loaded” by comparing only the extreme groups (very low vaxxed and very high vaxxed), and that it is theoretically possible that the middle group had the lowest adverse event rate of all. This is why I personally preferred to analyze all the groups using regression analysis. Quantitative is more informative than qualitative; regression is more informative than dichotomous.

I have shared other data with my students: the data set used in my paper here – https://pdmj.org/papers/Comment_on_Subramanian_and_Kumar

Or see here: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Hal-Switkay-2  My h-index is 1 (LOL).

Subramanian and Kumar are professors of public health. They published a paper using international data showing that COVID jab rates are, disappointingly, not negatively correlated with COVID new case rates. I took one look at the graph and gasped. Not negatively correlated? They are highly positively correlated!!! I wrote to Subramanian about this; he never replied. I did a quick correlation analysis based on second-term statistics, and sent it in as a letter to the editor of their journal, affiliated with Springer. They wrote back within 24 hours, the fastest turnaround ever in my experience. They stated that not only would they not publish my letter; NO Springer journal would publish my letter! Rejection, sight unseen!

I sent this to Dr. Colleen Huber, who agreed to publish this in the journal she founded, PDMJ. Just as she wrote “Neither Safe nor Effective”, my published work proved the jabs have negative efficacy, so I worked as well on the safety angle. I created some graphics illustrating the dangers of the COVID jabs. Please see the attached pdf, most of which I wrote. The graphics are all mine. I posted the graphic on page 9 outside my office door, showing that the COVID jabs are responsible for about 30 times as many dangerous adverse events as all vaccines combined. This includes “serious” (death, life threatening, permanent disability, birth defect, hospitalization), together with selected non-serious adverse events like myocarditis, heart attack, stroke, cancer, and neurological disease.

My attachment also explains why I use the more conservative under-reporting factor of 17, because of the comparison between VAERS and V-SAFE, an estimate I would like to publish. Thus I estimate 600K+ COVID jab deaths.

My home phone number is xxxxxxxx. I know you’re in CA. I’m in southeastern PA, so maybe I will ring you up after our lunch here. All the best to you and Wayne, and thanks for listening! Take care – Hal

My survey shouldn’t be a surprise to anyone who is familiar with these resources

  1. Paul Thomas Vaxxed-Unvaxxed presentation
  2. This post which includes a link to the excellent interview of Andrew Wakefield.

This post:

Brian Hooker’s book Vaxxed-Unvaxxed.

This excellent article:

Could the survey be biased and overestimate the effect size? The data shows the opposite!

All surveys are biased, but the question is whether the bias significantly impacts the data.

In this case, the bias is easy to assess.

If the survey is biased and overstating the effects, those who are highly vaccinated should be more injured than the general population. The reasoning is that if you are one of my followers, you became a follower after you were vaccine injured.

But this appears NOT to be the case!!

In short, my survey results underestimate the effects.

For example, here are the rates in the survey vs. population rates for the top conditions:

Febrile seizures: 21/2260=0.9% (survey) vs. 2% to 5% (general population)

Bipolar disease: 45/2260=2% (survey) vs. 4.4% (population)

ADHD: 233/2260=10.3% (survey) vs. 8.1% for adults (it’s higher in children)

Learning disability: 50/2260=2.2% (survey) vs. 15%-20%

Depression: 313/2260=13.8% (survey) vs. 29% (population)

Summary

Yeah, my survey was accurate. Yeah, the results are devastating even if just ONE of the effects is true.

Math never lies. Anyone can easily replicate.

I’ve tried to get people who believe in vaccines to survey their followers and they all stop talking to me after I ask. Every single one.

Do you know anyone with a large follower base (100K or more) who is willing to encourage their followers to fill out my survey? If so, please let me know!

There is no doubt in my mind the results can be replicated, but nobody wants to try for some reason.

Original source: https://kirschsubstack.com/p/college-math-professor-validates

Categories
Health

Churchgoers Clash With Police, Reminding Them of Their Cowardice and “Just Following Orders” Relating to Australia’s Excess Deaths from the COVID Jabs and How Bishop Mar Mari Warned Them Not to “Take That Poison”

Churchgoers Clash With Police, Reminding Them of Their Cowardice and “Just Following Orders” Relating to Australia’s Excess Deaths from the COVID Jabs and How Bishop Mar Mari Warned Them Not to “Take That Poison”

They chant, “BRING HIM OUT!” regarding the assailant.

 

———————–

Resources:
https://twitter.com/jamiemcintyre21/status/1780113907681775810
https://twitter.com/jamiemcintyre21/status/1779819977798996449

Categories
Health

Fire Service Still Enforcing Mandatory Vaccination After It Was Ruled Unlawful Interstate: Victorian MP

Fire Service Still Enforcing Mandatory Vaccination After It Was Ruled Unlawful Interstate: Victorian MP

By Monica O’Shea

A Victorian parliamentarian claims more than 50 Fire Rescue Victoria firefighters are unable to respond to emergencies due to a vaccine mandate.

Liberal Member for Western Victoria Bev McArthur has raised concerns the state’s fire service was still enforcing mandate vaccines.

Ms. McArthur said the minister for emergency services was “failing to take action.”

“Fire Rescue Victoria is the only fire service in Australia still enforcing mandatory vaccination,” Ms. McArthur said on April 10.
“Why are they such an outlier? It makes no medical sense. The last mandated dose was March 2022. It cannot be effective now. Nor does it apply to volunteers, who with the same vaccine status can work.”

Three COVID-19 vaccinations including a booster shot are still required to become a firefighter, according to a recruitment FAQ page on the Fire Rescue Victoria (FRV) website.

“No, FRV requires candidates to be fully vaccinated (boosted), which is three COVID-19 vaccinations,” the page indicates.”

The Liberal MP noted the Queensland Supreme Court has recently deemed vaccine mandates unlawful for frontline workers.

“The Court recognised that such mandates contradicted human rights legislation recognising a person’s right not to be subjected to medical treatment without full, free, and informed consent,” she said.

“This vaccine mandate enforces an outdated dosage that is contrary to Australian Technical Advisory Group on Immunisation (ATAGI) clinical recommendations, and it is starkly without consideration to its own suppressed Risk Assessment only obtained through FOI.”

Further, Ms. McArthur noted volunteer firefighters have fallen by 998 members, from 52,807 to 51,807 in a year.

“Given this ruling, the firefighter shortage, and the fact that Victoria continues to be an outlier, when will the Minister step up and request that the FRV remove this discriminatory policy?” she asked.
A spokesperson for Fire Rescue Victoria (FRV) said it continues to adopt an evidence-based approach to its management of the risks associated with COVID-19 transmission and infection.

“In this respect, vaccination against COVID-19 remains an important risk control, particularly given the nature of our work,” the spokesperson told The Epoch Times.

“The vast majority of our people, more than 98 percent, are vaccinated. This is a high figure for an organisation of more than 4,500 employees.”

The fire service said its priority remains ensuring workplaces are safe and without risks to health and safety.

“This is a priority we take seriously, particularly given our firefighters’ role in delivering life-saving medical care as part of our Emergency Medical Response (EMR) partnership with Ambulance Victoria,” FRV said.

Queensland Ruling

The Supreme Court of Queensland ruled that COVID-19 vaccine mandates on police officers and ambulance workers were unlawful under section 58 of the Human Rights Act on Feb. 27.

Judge Glenn Martin held (pdf) that the police commissioner failed to give “proper consideration” to human rights when making decisions related to the vaccine mandate directions.

“I do not accept that the commissioner had either identified the human rights that might be affected by the decision or considered whether the decision would be compatible with human rights,” the judge said.

Further, the court found that the former Department of Health Director-General did not establish the COVID-19 vaccine mandate as a condition of employment for Queensland Ambulance Service staff.

Judge Martin ordered for both the police commissioner and director-general of Queensland Health to be restrained from taking any enforcement actions or disciplinary proceedings related to mandates.

The court declared the human resources policy concerning COVID-19 vaccine requirements ineffective.

“I have not held that the QPS Directions and the QAS Direction were invalid, rather I have held that they were unlawful,” the judge said.

The judge did not address the vaccine’s transmissibility or efficacy in the ruling.

What Are the ATAGI Guidelines?

The Australian government’s advisory group on vaccinations, ATAGI, gives the strongest vaccine recommendations to the elderly and severely compromised.

In a statement (pdf) dated Feb. 29, ATAGI suggests healthy adults aged between 18 and 64 consider a COVID-19 vaccine every 12 months based on a risk benefit assessment.

Only adults between 65 to 74 years or between 18 and 64 years who are severely compromised are recommended officially to take a COVID-19 vaccine every 12 months and consider a dose every six months based on risk assessment.

Adults over 75 years of age are recommended to take a COVID-19 vaccine every six months by the advisory group.

“Vaccination remains the most important measure to protect those at risk of severe disease from COVID-19. COVID-19 vaccines are recommended every 6 to 12 months for older adults and adults with severe immunocompromise due to their ongoing risk of severe COVID-19,” ATAGI states.

Victorian MP Receiving Inquiries From Firefighters

In Parliament on March 21, Victorian Liberal South Eastern Metropolitan MP Ann-Marie Hermans said she is receiving inquiries from firefighters who want to return to work.

Ms. Hermans said she is seeking that the Minister for Emergency Services, Anthony Carbines, revoke the mandate on unvaccinated firefighters in Victoria immediately.

“In a Public Accounts and Estimates Committee hearing, I must say, it was confirmed by [Victorian Emergency Management Commissioner] Rick Nugent that firefighters without the vaccine would not be working this season. We are still in a fire season even though we are no longer in summer, and we always are at risk in our summer periods,” Ms. Hermans said in parliament (pdf).

“Meanwhile, we have a Country Fire Authority with outdated and inadequate resources, and we also have firefighters unable to do their jobs because their resources have not been properly updated.

Original source: https://www.theepochtimes.com/world/fire-service-still-enforcing-mandatory-vaccination-after-it-was-ruled-unlawful-victorian-mp-5626672

Categories
Health

UK ONS Denies Request from 7 MPs by Claiming that the Vaccines are Safe so there is No Need to Do any Analysis that Might Show Otherwise

UK ONS Denies Request from 7 MPs by Claiming that the Vaccines are Safe so there is No Need to Do any Analysis that Might Show Otherwise

By STEVE KIRSCH

The head of the UK ONS says that the data is available for qualified researchers but qualified researchers who have challenged the narrative have been denied access. So the data shall remain hidden!

Executive summary

The head of the UK ONS wrote a letter in response to a request from 7 members of Parliament saying that the vaccines are safe and they have better things to do with their time than run a report that would have taken them less than 1 hour of effort to do.

In fact, it seems likely that Professor Diamond spent more time writing the letter explaining why he was denying the request than it would have taken to comply with the request.

Professor Diamond also used the excuse (without any evidence whatsoever) that small counts could reveal personal information. For example, suppose you knew that one man aged between 70 and 75 died 4 weeks after his most recent shot in the UK in the month of April 2023. Can you identify the man? Of course not!

He said that the data is available for qualified researchers but qualified researchers who have challenged the narrative have been denied access in the past. So the data shall remain hidden!

Short story: they do not want the public to know the truth.

The request

Here is the letter requesting the data.

Having spent many months analyzing the data from New Zealand, I can assure you that the requested UK data would reveal the truth and does not reveal anyone’s PII.

You prove this for yourself with the New Zealand data that is published on my server.

The denial of the the request

Science and truth

Science is all about finding the truth.

The UK ONS is convinced they are right, so reasonable requests from people with opposing views are denied. That is anti-science.

They say misinformation is dangerous yet they are unwilling to respond to a very simple request to determine who is telling the truth.

There is a huge excess mortality problem in the UK. Nobody can explain it. The reason is simple: the staff at the UK ONS is standing in the way of transparency.

Summary

The requested data would reveal the truth, but they don’t want the truth to be known.

The MPs simply requested the ONS to re-run the analysis they’ve already done, but with different parameters. This should take far less than 60 minutes of someone’s time to do.

The excuse that it might reveal personal information is simply gaslighting. New Zealand has a population of only 5M compared with the UK 69M. I’ve shown that by putting deaths of over 100 years into a single bucket, no person can be identified with the requested analysis, even if there are single counts.

The analysis requested by the MPs would be dispositive. It would expose the truth.

Anytime people dodge easy data transparency requests like this, it’s compelling evidence that the data doesn’t support their claims.

They don’t want you to know how deadly the COVID vaccines were. It’s no more complicated than that.

Next steps

A UK researcher will request permission to do the analysis we requested. I predict the ONS will find a reason to deny that as well.

———————–

Original source: https://kirschsubstack.com/p/uk-ons-denies-request-from-7-mps

Categories
Health

Our Food Supply Under Attack! An Interview with Sasha Latypova

Our Food Supply Under Attack! An Interview with Sasha Latypova

By STEVE KIRSCH

VSRF Live #122: Our Food Under Attack

 

Thursday, April 11th: 7pm Eastern | 4pm Pacific

We speak with legendary whistleblower and pharma industry insider Sasha Latypova about shocking evidence around the next major effort to get synthetic MRNA into the public’s bodies; via the food supply! Where the vaccine campaign failed, tainted food will win. That is, unless we fight back and demand accountability with these genetic products NOW!

Latypova will share her recent research on the prevalence of MRNA based vaccines in our meat supply and the associated risks of these genetic and recombinant products now in wide use, including:

  • Risks of integration into host genome and/or microbiome with subsequent long-term expression of aberrant proteins
  • Risks of shedding to humans and off-target animal species
  • Microbiome degradation (dysbiosis) highly likely – drives cancer, diabetes, neurodegenerative, gastrointestinal and many other debilitating conditions
  • Risk of genome integration
  • Transfer into soils and plant bacteria via animal waste and water
  • Massive antibiotic resistance – ALL genetic vaccines are made from DNA plasmids with antibiotic resistant genes

Original source: https://kirschsubstack.com/p/vsrf-live-tonight-our-food-supply

Categories
Health

Royal Australian College of General Practitioners has Released a Paper & Reportedly Sent it to all GPs

Royal Australian College of General Practitioners has Released a Paper & Reportedly Sent it to all GPs

Stunning revelations from an entity that originally pushed the Covid injections

Key paragraphs buried in middle of their paper

From The White Rabbit on X. See link below

BREAKING:

𝗟𝗼𝗼𝗸 𝗮𝘁 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗥𝗼𝘆𝗮𝗹 𝗔𝘂𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗹𝗶𝗮𝗻 𝗖𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗲𝗴𝗲 𝗼𝗳 𝗚𝗲𝗻𝗲𝗿𝗮𝗹 𝗣𝗿𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗵𝗮𝘀 𝗷𝘂𝘀𝘁 𝗽𝘂𝗯𝗹𝗶𝘀𝗵𝗲𝗱 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗮𝗹𝗹 𝗔𝘂𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗹𝗶𝗮𝗻 𝗱𝗼𝗰𝘁𝗼𝗿𝘀!! This explains the increased disease/deaths and long Covid in three paragraphs.

“Multiple studies have shown an increased risk of myocarditis after vaccination with mRNA encoding SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. mRNA vaccines can result in spike protein expression in muscle tissue, the lymphatic system, cardiomyocytes and other cells after entry into the circulation. 𝙍𝙚𝙘𝙞𝙥𝙞𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙨 𝙤𝙛 𝙩𝙬𝙤 𝙤𝙧 𝙢𝙤𝙧𝙚 𝙞𝙣𝙟𝙚𝙘𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣𝙨 𝙤𝙛 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙢𝙍𝙉𝘼 𝙫𝙖𝙘𝙘𝙞𝙣𝙚𝙨 𝙙𝙞𝙨𝙥𝙡𝙖𝙮 𝙖 𝙘𝙡𝙖𝙨𝙨 𝙨𝙬𝙞𝙩𝙘𝙝 𝙩𝙤 𝙄𝙜𝙂4 𝙖𝙣𝙩𝙞𝙗𝙤𝙙𝙞𝙚𝙨. 𝘼𝙗𝙣𝙤𝙧𝙢𝙖𝙡𝙡𝙮 𝙝𝙞𝙜𝙝 𝙡𝙚𝙫𝙚𝙡𝙨 𝙤𝙛 𝙄𝙜𝙂4 𝙢𝙞𝙜𝙝𝙩 𝙘𝙖𝙪𝙨𝙚 𝙖𝙪𝙩𝙤𝙞𝙢𝙢𝙪𝙣𝙚 𝙙𝙞𝙨𝙚𝙖𝙨𝙚𝙨, 𝙥𝙧𝙤𝙢𝙤𝙩𝙚 𝙘𝙖𝙣𝙘𝙚𝙧 𝙜𝙧𝙤𝙬𝙩𝙝, 𝙖𝙪𝙩𝙤𝙞𝙢𝙢𝙪𝙣𝙚 𝙢𝙮𝙤𝙘𝙖𝙧𝙙𝙞𝙩𝙞𝙨 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙤𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧 𝙄𝙜𝙂 4-𝙧𝙚𝙡𝙖𝙩𝙚𝙙 𝙙𝙞𝙨𝙚𝙖𝙨𝙚𝙨 (𝙄𝙜𝙂4-𝙍𝘿) 𝙞𝙣 𝙨𝙪𝙨𝙘𝙚𝙥𝙩𝙞𝙗𝙡𝙚 𝙞𝙣𝙙𝙞𝙫𝙞𝙙𝙪𝙖𝙡𝙨.”

And,

“There are clear implications for vaccine boosting where these and similar observations relating to COVID-19 vaccination and the incidence of long COVID-like symptoms are substantiated, adding further to public health officials’ concerns. Understanding the persistence of viral mRNA and viral protein and their cellular pathological effects after vaccination with and without infection is clearly required. Because COVID-19 VACCINES WERE APPROVED WITHOUT LONG-TERM SAFETY DATA AND MIGHT CAUSE IMMUNE DYSFUNCTION, it is perhaps premature to assume that past SARS-CoV-2 infection is the sole common factor in long COVID.”

And

“There is concern that COVID-19 vaccination per se might contribute to long COVID, giving rise to the colloquial term ‘Long Vax(x)’.22 The spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 exhibits pathogenic characteristics and is a possible cause of post-acute sequelae after SARS-CoV-2 infection or COVID-19 vaccination.”

Link to the publication reportedly sent to General Practitioners in Australia:

Long COVID: Sufferers can take heart

Millions worldwide experience post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC or long COVID), according to the World Health Organization (WHO), European Union and the UK and US governments. Long COVID symptoms >12 weeks after the initial severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection affecting 2–20% of patients with mild and severe acute COVID-19 are endemic in every jurisdiction with a competent health reporting system.1 Although the Australian Bureau of Statistics and other health agencies in Australia do not survey the prevalence of long COVID, it is estimated that it affects hundreds of thousands, presaging a parliamentary inquiry into long COVID and repeated SARS-CoV-2 infection, which reported to Federal Government in April 2023. The 566 submissions to the Inquiry, including those from states, territories, professional bodies and the public, largely concur with the view that long COVID presents health management and sociological challenges to Australian society (conspicuously, the Queensland Government has a somewhat different perspective, attributing long COVID to a predominantly nocebo effect). Furthermore, the submissions recognise significant wellbeing and financial challenges to individuals with long COVID.

Long COVID is a heterogeneous disease with variable cardiac, pulmonary, haematological and neurological involvement in which investigation of patient-reported symptoms is frequently unremarkable. Long COVID’s overlap with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome, postural orthopaedic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) and other post-viral manifestations8 predisposes to a diagnosis by exclusion.

There is no consensus on what causes lingering COVID-19 symptoms long after the acute infection has cleared.7 Indeed, there is no definition of what long COVID is. At present, public health officials are flying blind when it comes to long COVID and vaccination.

Often unable to secure a diagnosis, patients are wont to seek multiple serial medical opinions, frequently being told their condition is due to anxiety or post-pandemic mental issues.

The median duration of long COVID symptoms is five months, but 10% of patients still experience symptoms at 12 months. Fatigue, shortness of breath and difficulty concentrating are reported at least up to two years after SARS-CoV-2 infection. It is still too early to say whether some individuals with long COVID might never recover.

Long COVID patients present elevated inflammatory biomarkers (eg interleukin-6, C-reactive protein, tumour necrosis factor-α), which might function as a core set of blood biomarkers that can be used to diagnose and manage long COVID patients in clinical practice.

Those subscribing to long COVID digital support groups report months of frustration at not being listened to, finding the health system woefully inadequate, with few primary or secondary care professionals knowing enough to offer much. The outcome for some of those experiencing long COVID is self-prescribed medication using over-the-counter remedies and dietary changes based on potentially conflicting or misleading online information. Some speak of a substantial proportion of their income being used in this way.

Meanwhile, jobs, careers, incomes, community involvements, friendships, relationships, hope for a recovery and mental health are being destroyed. Those experiencing long COVID report that the long COVID digital support group is the ‘… only place they feel safe to share, the only place they feel understood, accepted, [and] supported’.

One in five of those experiencing long COVID in the UK stopped working and was not back to work six months after disease onset. In Australia, an estimated 240,000 of those with long COVID no longer work full time. Work absenteeism might significantly impact the nation’s economy, as in the UK. In the US, long COVID has been declared a national emergency.

Reduced to working part time to cope with unwellness, those with long COVID commonly report having to wait a year or more before receiving a diagnosis.4 Without a definitive diagnosis, those with long COVID are not eligible for Job Seeker, the Disability Support Pension and National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) protection under the Fair Work Act, thereby conferring long-term financial difficulties for themselves and their dependents. There is a need for guidelines on how those with long COVID can access social security and employment protection.

Primary healthcare providers need more guidance from the Federal and State Health Department authorities on handling the long COVID deluge,4 and need to be educated on how to diagnose long COVID and best support those with the condition. Although some states have established long COVID clinics, some of these at least are of little help to the patient in providing substantive treatment guidelines or support and are little more than incident report centres. The waiting time for a long COVID clinic is typically several months or more.4 Some general practitioners (GPs) were unaware of the clinics’ existence in their area (R Tindle, pers. obs.). Clinics should be a resource to primary health providers, contribute to treatment plans and be able to refer to specialists. Clinical management, including mental health, should be codesigned with patients’ lived experiences. Specialised long COVID clinics now operate in numerous European countries; 1500 patients per week are referred to UK long COVID clinics, which provide online recovery platforms, hubs for children and GP training.

There is concern that COVID-19 vaccination per se might contribute to long COVID, giving rise to the colloquial term ‘Long Vax(x)’. The spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 exhibits pathogenic characteristics and is a possible cause of post-acute sequelae after SARS-CoV-2 infection or COVID-19 vaccination. COVID-19 vaccines utilise a modified, stabilised prefusion spike protein that might share similar toxic effects with its viral counterpart. A possible association between COVID-19 vaccination and the incidence of POTS has been demonstrated in a cohort of 284,592 COVID-19-vaccinated individuals, though at a rate that was one-fifth of the incidence of POTS after SARS-CoV-2 infection. Multiple studies have shown an increased risk of myocarditis after vaccination with mRNA encoding SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. mRNA vaccines can result in spike protein expression in muscle tissue, the lymphatic system, cardiomyocytes and other cells after entry into the circulation. Recipients of two or more injections of the mRNA vaccines display a class switch to IgG4 antibodies. Abnormally high levels of IgG4 might cause autoimmune diseases, promote cancer growth, autoimmune myocarditis and other IgG 4-related diseases (IgG4-RD) in susceptible individuals. There are clear implications for vaccine boosting where these and similar observations relating to COVID-19 vaccination and the incidence of long COVID-like symptoms are substantiated, adding further to public health officials’ concerns. Understanding the persistence of viral mRNA and viral protein and their cellular pathological effects after vaccination with and without infection is clearly required. Because COVID-19 vaccines were approved without long-term safety data and might cause immune dysfunction, it is perhaps premature to assume that past SARS-CoV-2 infection is the sole common factor in long COVID. The Australian Government’s promise of $50 million from the Medical Research Future Fund for long COVID research will hopefully foment nationally coordinated long COVID and COVID-19 research programs encompassing basic science through to models of care. The proposed development of a national centre for disease control providing a national interrogative repository for hitherto fragmented incidence and outcome data for long COVID will aid in these investigations.

An encouraging step forward is the recent discovery in a preclinical model of a peptide inhibitor of nuclear angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 that reverses the persistent inflammation driving long COVID, reduces the latent viral reservoir in monocytes/macrophages and is associated with reduced SARS-CoV-2 spike protein expression in monocytes from individuals who have recovered from infection. It also enhances immune protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection. Clinical trials are pending.

The above initiatives, plus the recent listing of the antiviral drugs, Paxlovid (nirmatrelvir and ritonavir) and Lagevrio (molnupiravir) on the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme, and the updated Royal Australian College of General Practitioners’ guidelines for managing patients, indicate that long COVID is, at last, receiving the attention it requires. Over time, the sentiment of those with long COVID has become more positive, reflecting increased knowledge, acceptance and awareness of long COVID and health system responses to the condition.

Long COVID is not an easy medical condition for clinicians, health administrators, support systems or patients. The Australian health system is already stretched in coping with other chronic medical conditions. Nevertheless, we must do better than in the approximate three years since long COVID was first reported.

Resources:
https://twitter.com/MRobertsQLD/status/1778281032040747093
https://www1.racgp.org.au/ajgp/2024/april/long-covid-sufferers-can-take-heart

Categories
Health

The Pandemic was Used as a False Pretext by the WHO to Drive Vaccinations of all Peoples in the World

The Pandemic was Used as a False Pretext by the WHO to Drive Vaccinations of all People in the World

Twitter Post By Jamie McIntyre

Japanese Professor Delivers Stunning Message Everyone Needs to Hear

“The pandemic was used as a false pretext by the WHO to drive vaccinations of all peoples in the world.”

He says the fraudulent use of “experimental gene therapy to healthy people” was not only an “extreme violation of human rights,” but “the result was the induction of the terrible drug-induced injury that has never [been] seen in human history.”

– Prof Masayasu Inoue, Professor Emeritus of Osaka City University Medical School.

Source: Aussie17’s Substack.

Do Not Take This Warning by Neil Oliver Lightly.

Joe Rogan Drops Theory Explaining Why Most Doctors Are Silent on COVID Vax Injuries and Deaths.

Click Here To Play the Video

Original source: https://x.com/jamiemcintyre21/status/1778303238326096085

Categories
Health

It’s Time to Amend the US Constitution to Protect Medical Freedom

It’s Time to Amend the US Constitution to Protect Medical Freedom

By Steve Kirsch

There is no way that the US Congress is ever going to side with the people instead of the drug companies. So amending the US Constitution is necessary and sufficient.

Executive summary

I’m starting a process to amend the US Constitution to fix the loopholes that allow Congress to act in the interests of the drug companies instead of the people.

If you have any knowledge or experience regarding the best way to do this (since it is a lost art), I need to hear from you in the comments below.

AFAIK, the last effort to do this was the Every Vote Counts Amendment (2005).

Provisions of the amendment

Here’s my checklist of what I’d be happy with. It may need to be adjusted to ensure adequate public support:

  1. No more coercion: Nobody should be coerced into taking any medical intervention that they do not want to take, e.g., take the jab or you’re fired.
  2. No more immunity: Congress shall make no law limiting the liability of any provider of any product or service.
  3. No more intimidation: Medical doctors shall have free speech rights and shall not have their credentials challenged for anything they say.
  4. No more hiding public health data: Death records of everyone in the US who dies shall be made publicly available showing, for each person, their DOB, DOD, sex, race, and vaccine type, manufacturer, dose number, and vaccination date for all vaccines in the last 3 years of vaccinations.
  5. Make the Constitution easier to amend. As the video points out, things have changed a little bit since the Constitution was first adopted. It needs to be updated.

We can do this because this has huge public support

Yes. Here’s why:

You see, the drug companies don’t really need the liability protection anymore because everyone knows the vaccines are soooooooooo safe!

Secondly, I believe I can raise the $1B needed to pass this. The drug companies will be spending $10B or more to gaslight the American people to not voting for this.

Summary

It’s time to learn from our mistakes and fix the law so that it doesn’t happen again. Since these provisions are extremely popular among the people, this is doable. We owe it to future generations to try. Nobody ever won a chess game by resigning.

Original source: https://kirschsubstack.com/p/its-time-to-amend-the-us-constitution

"All In" Starter Package


The Fast Start


Level 2️⃣


Level 1️⃣


Level 4️⃣ (5000 USD)


Level 3️⃣ (1500 USD)