Truth Talks are apart of the TruthGroup which also owns the fast growing censor social media platform, Truthbook.social

Categories
COVID 19 deaths and injuries

Whoops! FOIA Response From Santa Clara County Reveals that the COVID Shots INCREASED Your Risk of Getting COVID!

Whoops! FOIA Response From Santa Clara County Reveals that the COVID Shots INCREASED Your Risk of Getting COVID!

By STEVE KIRSCH

The COVID vaccines worked in reverse making people more susceptible. Attempts to contact Santa Clara County Public Health Department for comment were totally ignored.

They tell you to get the shot, but their own data shows that the shots make it more likely you’ll get COVID.

Executive summary

Based on new data I just got from a FOIA request, it appears that the public health epidemiologists in Santa Clara County knew in January 2022 that the vaccines made people more likely to get COVID, but they remained silent.

I predict that there will be further silence on this matter: no accountability and no opportunity for public challenges. They will continue to push the shots as if nothing had happened and the mainstream media will ignore this important data.

Here is the data for you to download yourself

Download it here. When you click the link, it will silently download the Excel file to your Downloads folder.

Summary of the data

The data in the spreadsheet is from January 2022 and contains a line for each person who was diagnosed with COVID in that month.

N means unvaccinated. Y means vaccinated. U means unknown. Blank means unknown.

Santa Clara County is highly vaccinated (95%), but it isn’t that highly vaccinated!

The rows are 10 year age groups.

So the percentage of people who were diagnosed with COVID (98% or more) was higher than the percentage of people who got the vaccine (under 95%).

In other words, the vaccine made you more likely to get COVID instead of 10X less likely that they claimed in the clinical trials.

This is consistent with the

The exact same thing is happening in Australia!

Stunning parallels in Australia:

Summary

  1. The COVID vaccine trials were fraudulent. There is no possible way they got 90% efficacy (a 10X reduction in infection risk). They did it through deception as described here. The vaccines actually made you more likely to get COVID as we learned from the Santa Clara data, the Cleveland Clinic study, and numerous other sources (see this article for example).
  2. The numbers here are highly statistically significant. It appears that the Santa Clara County Health epidemiologists knew something was wrong by January 2022, but instead of warning people, they kept their mouths shut about it. There was no public admission of this, no public warning. I predict that there will NEVER be any public accountability of what happened because public officials never like to admit they were responsible for killing people with these useless and deadly vaccines.
  3. The Santa Clara County Health Department ignored all my attempts (multiple phone calls and emails) to solicit a response to this article.

Original Source: https://kirschsubstack.com/p/whoops-foia-response-from-santa-clara

Categories
COVID 19 deaths and injuries

Know Anyone Thinking of Getting Another COVID Shot? Urge Them to Watch This Short Video on Vaccine Injuries First!

Know Anyone Thinking of Getting Another COVID Shot? Urge Them to Watch This Short Video on Vaccine Injuries First!

By STEVE KIRSCH

If you know anyone who is considering getting more jabs, please urge them to watch this short video. It was created nearly 1 year ago and has over 1M views. The end is tragic.

The video ends with the compelling testimony of Stephanie de Garay describing her daughter Maddie’s participation in the Pfizer 12-15 year old trial.

Maddie de Garay, who was 12 years old at the time of the trial, was permanently disabled less than 24 hours after her second Pfizer shot in the clinical trial with 1,131 kids (aged 12-15) getting the shot. 1 in 1,000 kids being permanently disabled due to the shot should have stopped the trial. But Pfizer covered it up and never reported the actual injury; they deliberately misreported it as abdominal pain, including in their paper published in the NEJM. No complaints from the mainstream medical community about scientific fraud have surfaced.

The fraudulent paper is still published in the NEJM. The paper says: “there were no vaccine-related serious adverse events and few overall severe adverse events.” That’s a blatant lie.

But the NEJM isn’t going to retract the paper despite the clear proof of scientific fraud. And doctors will believe what is in the literature, not what is obvious in plain sight. Because that’s the way science works.

FDA Commissioner Janet Woodcock promised me that the FDA would investigate, but no investigation has ever taken place; not from the FDA, CDC, Pfizer, or anyone else.

America should be told why there was never an investigation, but the mainstream media will never ask that question.

I hope you enjoy the video and Stephanie’s testimony at the end.

How many people were seriously injured by the COVID vaccines?

From the V-safe data, we can estimate that around 8% of vaccine recipients had a serious injury due to the COVID vaccine. Since over 270M Americans got the shot, this means that over 20M Americans were seriously injured.

Check out these disability graphs compiled by the St. Louis Fed:

Here’s the 3rd graph in detail:

Population - With a Disability, 16 Years and over ...

A rise like this is not random; it is caused by something that is disabling over 1 million of Americans.

Yet, NOBODY is asking any questions as to why the disability rates rose to new highs right after the COVID vaccines rolled out.

If it wasn’t the COVID vaccine, what was it?

And why is nobody talking about this?

Until this is resolved, don’t you think that getting another COVID shot is premature?

Summary

Watch the video and keep in mind that this is a small sampling of the millions of people who have been injured by the COVID vaccines.

If you know anyone thinking about getting another jab, show them the video or forward this article.

————————-

Original source: https://kirschsubstack.com/p/know-anyone-thinking-of-getting-another

Categories
COVID 19 deaths and injuries

New Thailand Randomized Clinical Trial Shows Early Treatment With Just 2 Drugs was 100% Effective in Eliminating Risk of Hospitalization from COVID

New Thailand Randomized Clinical Trial Shows Early Treatment With Just 2 Drugs was 100% Effective in Eliminating Risk of Hospitalization from COVID

By STEVE KIRSCH

Fluvoxamine in combination with one other drug was 100% successful in preventing hospitalization for COVID in this multi-drug trial in Thailand. Those on standard of care: 37.5% hospitalized!

Executive summary

A new trial out of Thailand recently published in the medical peer-reviewed literature with 995 participants showed that treatment with fluvoxamine and at least one other drug was 100% successful in preventing hospitalization from COVID. For those receiving standard of care, 37.5% required hospitalization.

We presented evidence from multiple trials of the efficacy of fluvoxamine in early 2021 to the FDA in our EUA application, but they said that the benefits didn’t outweigh the risks and denied our EUA.

Their decision made no sense as the scientific evidence couldn’t have been more clear at the time.

Now, with this new trial result published, the FDA, CDC, NIH will continue to ignore this data, just as they have in the past. They will continue to recommend the unsafe and ineffective COVID vaccine as the only recommended treatment for COVID.

I predict that the CDC, FDA, NIH, WHO, and Gates Foundation will never inform doctors or recommend any of these highly effective and safe early treatment combination drugs; it simply doesn’t matter how strong the evidence is.

What the paper said

Among 1900 recruited, a total of 995 participants completed the trial. No participants had clinical deterioration by day 9, 14, or 28 days among those treated with fluvoxamine plus bromhexine (0%), fluvoxamine plus cyproheptadine (0%), or niclosamide plus bromhexine (0%).

Nine participants (5.6%) in the fluvoxamine arm had clinical deterioration by day 28, requiring low-flow oxygen.

In contrast, most standard care arm participants had clinical deterioration by 9, 14, and 28 days. By day 9, 32.7% (110) of patients in the standard care arm had been hospitalized without requiring supplemental oxygen but needing ongoing medical care. By day 28, this percentage increased to 37.5% (21).

Additionally, 20.8% (70) of patients in the standard care arm required low-flow oxygen by day 9, and 12.5% (16) needed non-invasive or mechanical ventilation by day 28. All treated groups significantly differed from the standard care group by days 9, 14, and 28 (p < 0.0001).

Also, by day 28, the three 2-drug treatments were significantly better than the fluvoxamine [only] arm (p < 0.0001).

No deaths occurred in any study group. Compared to standard care, participants treated with the combination agents had significantly decreased viral loads as early as day 3 of treatment (p < 0.0001), decreased levels of serum cytokines interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), and interleukin-1 beta (IL-1β) as early as day 5 of treatment, and interleukin-8 (IL-8) by day 7 of treatment (p < 0.0001) and lower incidence of post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC) symptoms (p < 0.0001).

23 serious adverse events occurred in the standard care arm, while only 1 serious adverse event was reported in the fluvoxamine arm, and zero serious adverse events occurred in the other arms.

Summary

Unlike COVID vaccines, the early treatments used in this study are safe and effective.

We’ve known about the efficacy of multi-drug treatments since early 2020. For example, George Fareed and Brian Tyson treated over 10,000 COVID patients with multi-drug therapies and rarely had any hospitalizations (and those were only when treatment was delayed). The CDC and FDA ignored every one of these real-world examples.

It seems obvious that no matter how strong the evidence is for multi-drug treatments, they will never become standard of care among physicians because none of the world’s health authorities will ever admit they were wrong.

The mainstream media, medical community, FDA, CDC, NIH, WHO, GAVI, and the Gates Foundation should all be informing people of this new result which is consistent with many earlier studies. But they will all remain silent about it. Protecting your health is not consistent with their mission.

They will all continue to support the censorship, intimidation, and silencing of anyone who claims that any early treatments work for COVID. We will never have a public debate on any of these issues because they are all corrupt and they know it.

100% prevention of hospitalization with a 2-drug combination. 37.5% hospitalization rate for those treated with the standard of care.

Original source: https://kirschsubstack.com/p/new-thailand-randomized-clinical

Categories
COVID 19 deaths and injuries

The New Rise of “Shaken Baby Syndrome”

The New Rise of “Shaken Baby Syndrome”

By STEVE KIRSCH

I’m getting reports of parents who had their child vaccinated subsequently being accused of “shaken baby syndrome” and had their child taken from them. Their crime? Following their doctors’ advice.

Parents who follow their physician’s advice to vaccinate their kids can find that their child subsequently develops encephalitis soon after vaccination (more likely when multiple vaccines are given at once and even more likely if the child has an infection at the time of vaccination) which then becomes a permanent brain injury.

Their doctor then reports the parents to Child Protective Services for “shaken baby syndrome” and their child is taken away.

Physicians are never to blame of course, because vaccines are safe and effective.

While this is unlikely to happen to any of my readers who know better than to ever vaccinate their kids, it is happening to parents who are not aware that vaccine risks outweigh the benefits because they rely on their doctors for medical advice.

Also, DPT vaccine injuries were also often attributed to shaken baby syndrome. And SIDS was partially created to cover up vaccine deaths.

This is becoming more prevalent now with COVID vaccines being part of the mix.

Original source: https://kirschsubstack.com/p/the-new-rise-of-shaken-baby-syndrome

Categories
COVID 19 deaths and injuries

Dr. Pierre Kory: Big Pharma is ‘TERRIFIED’ of Vitamin D

Dr. Pierre Kory: Big Pharma is ‘TERRIFIED’ of vitamin D

Why?

Because “It threatens the DISEASE MODEL.”

A new meta-analysis out of Italy, published in the journal, Nutrients, has unearthed some shocking data about Vitamin D.

Looking at data from 16 different studies and 1.26 million individuals, the meta-analysis revealed:

• Vitamin D showed about 60% effectiveness against the incidence of COVID-19 in randomized control trials.

• Vitamin D showed about 40-50% effectiveness in reducing the incidence of COVID-19 in observational studies.

• For preventing severe COVID-19 cases requiring ICU care, vitamin D supplementation was about 70% effective.

So, we didn’t need to lock ourselves inside for years, be afraid, and vilify our neighbors for not wearing a mask.

All we needed to do was to go outside, get sunshine, and increase our vitamin D levels, and everything would have been fine.

Click Here To Play the Video

—————————

Resources:
https://t.me/VigilantFox/11019
https://twitter.com/TuckerCarlson/status/1768033041568727391/video/1

Categories
COVID 19 deaths and injuries

How Many People Died From the COVID Shot? Do Vaccines Actually Cause Autism? Steve Kirsch has Looked at the Data

How Many People Died From the COVID Shot? Do Vaccines Actually Cause Autism? Steve Kirsch has Looked at the Data

By Tucker Carlson

How many people died from the COVID shot? Do vaccines actually cause autism? Steve Kirsch has looked at the data.

Click Here To Play the Video

——————————-

Original source: https://twitter.com/TuckerCarlson/status/1761148935572459745

Categories
COVID 19 deaths and injuries

WATCH: Medical Staff Offers Assisted Suicide To Canadian Woman Paralyzed From COVID Shots

WATCH: Medical Staff Offers Assisted Suicide To Canadian Woman Paralyzed From COVID Shots

By The General

WATCH: Medical Staff Offers Assisted Suicide To Canadian Woman Paralyzed From COVID Shots.

Click Here To Play the Video

Original source: https://t.me/GeneralMCNews/7526

Categories
COVID 19 deaths and injuries

17 Million Estimated Deaths from the COVID Vax Which is Well Over 20 Million Now and Rapidly Rising

17 Million Estimated Deaths from the COVID Vax Which is Well Over 20 Million Now and Rapidly Rising

Twitter Post By Jamie McIntyre

17 million estimated deaths from the COVID Vax which is well over 20 million now and rapidly rising.

It may well reach over 100 million within the 5-10 year time frame or could it be even worse.

Injured – well over 100 million and likely to reach over 1 billion.

All of this the Australian National Review Predicted years ago, as the most likely case scenario.

We were silenced and censored and canceled, and funds frozen.

I had to leave my own country, due to criminal threats by the Australian Government if I continued to fund the Australian National Review.

But the truth is now coming out and justice will be one day delivered.
But sadly for those who have lost loved ones, nothing can restore what they have lost.

If only we could have warned more before we were de-platformed. So many more lives could have been saved.

http://Anrnews.com

Original source: https://twitter.com/jamiemcintyre21/status/1761335497245573594

Categories
COVID 19 deaths and injuries

99 Million Patient Records and they Concluded that the Benefits Outweigh the Risks!?!? We Respectfully Disagree

99 Million Patient Records, and they concluded that the Benefits Outweigh the Risks!?!? We Respectfully Disagree

By STEVE KIRSCH

A multinational Global Vaccine Data Network (GVDN) cohort study of 99 million vaccinated individuals concludes that the benefits of COVID outweigh the risks. My colleagues and I disagree.

Executive summary

A new study of over 99 million vaccinated people has been highly promoted in the press with headlines like “Covid Vaccines Linked To Small Increase In Heart And Brain Disorders, Study Finds—But Risk From Infection Is Far Higher.”

I’m going to convince you that this is bullshit.

You can also read this excellent take-down by James Lyons-Weiller of the 99M patient study. The tl;dr is that the study is untrustworthy.

Results at a glance

A safe vaccine would be indistinguishable from a placebo. Does this look safe to you?

Quick summary of what the article would like you to believe

Here are the key points of the study which was funded by the CDC and HHS so no conflict of interest at all:

  1. They looked at the medical records of 99,068,901 vaccinated individuals.
  2. They compared observed vs. expected (“OE”) rates of “13 selected adverse events of special interest (AESI) across neurological, haematological, and cardiac outcomes.”
  3. They only looked for 42 days after the shots since everyone knows you can’t get adverse events after 42 days (I’m being sarcastic).
  4. They didn’t evaluate mortality due to the shot since everyone knows the vaccines are safe and didn’t kill anyone (I’m being sarcastic).
  5. They found clearly increased risk of the various AESI, but the end conclusion is that the risks after COVID infection are far higher, so people should take the shots. This is unbelievable. I don’t know a single cardiologist whose business dropped after the COVID vaccines rolled out. Do you?
  6. As usual, they aren’t allowed to share the data so you have to take their word for it.

The benefits of the COVID vaccine

There aren’t any I’m aware of.

A JAMA paper inadvertently revealed that the flu vaccine and COVID vaccine don’t work at all.

Nobody has been able to explain away that result. Nobody. Ever. They just don’t want to talk about it.

Why take a vaccine if the benefit is not measurable? That VA study was the perfect proving ground. The signal should have been large. There was no signal for either the COVID or flu vaccine. It was a stunning paper.

I always love it when a paper inadvertently blows the whole narrative out of the water and the medical community is completely clueless as to its significance.

The risks of the vaccine

The paper selected just 13 AESIs to evaluate.

But did you know that the CDC has determined that there are over 500 AESIs that were more serious than myocarditis? They simply forgot to tell people that!

Here are the actual numbers from this excellent article by Josh Guetzkow:

After dropping the new COVID-era AEs, there are 503 AEs with PRRs larger than myocarditis (PRR=3.09) and 552 with PRRs larger than pericarditis (PRR=2.82).5 This means that 66.4% of the AEs had a bigger safety signal than myocarditis and 77.3% were larger than pericarditis. You can see what those were by using this Excel file provided by the CDC and sorting the 18+ tab by the 12/14-07/29 PRR column (Column E). Then just look at which AEs have PRRs larger than the ones for pericarditis and myocarditis.

I have a question.

At a minimum, they should have warned people about myocarditis and everything more serious than that. So you should have been handed a long list of serious adverse events before you got the shot.

If you got the shot, please let me know if they warned you:

They claim that risks for GBS, etc. are higher from the virus than from the vaccine

The paper claims that even though the risks were elevated, that multiple studies show the virus itself is more dangerous:

But even if that was true (which it isn’t), it doesn’t matter because, as I mentioned earlier, the vaccine doesn’t prevent you from getting COVID, so the vaccine is simply adding to the risk.

The reality that I see shows that the vaccine is way more dangerous than the virus ever was

I have huge difficulty believing that the virus is more dangerous than the vaccine. If that were true and the vaccine resulted in a net benefit, we’d be seeing cases of myocarditis DROP after the vaccines rolled out.

Where is the evidence for that?

I can’t find a single cardiologist whose myocarditis rates in kids went DOWN after the vaccines rolled out. Can you?

In a survey of 1,000 randomly selected Americans that was done by a professional market research firm, nearly half the deaths reported in the survey were ascribed to the vaccine, not to the virus. That’s a very serious safety signal. How could this study have missed it? Of course, no health authority is willing to run their own survey. They don’t really want to learn the truth.

Here’s what people actually observed in real-life, but these are just anecdotes of course:

As you can see, there is a huge disconnect here. Someone is lying to you. Big time.

Unfortunately, no pro-vax person will try to replicate this survey. They just don’t want to know for some reason.

The myocarditis risk is all over the place in the peer-reviewed literature

According to the peer-reviewed literature (Patone), myocarditis risk is elevated by 1.5 to 1.7X after a Pfizer shot, but if you got the virus, your risk of myocarditis is 11X higher if you are unvaxxed and 5X higher if you are vaxxed. So the claim in the literature is that the virus is more dangerous which is clearly at odds with the surveys above.

That same paper admitted if you are male <40, your risk of myocarditis is over 6X higher than after the virus for the 2nd dose of the Moderna shot. So if you are a male <40, vaccination makes no sense, especially since it’s all downside. But the CDC will never tell you that and the paper doesn’t make any distinction at all for different ages.

Let’s look at a paper authored by scientists at the New Zealand Ministry of Health entitled “Adverse Events Following the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine (Pfizer-BioNTech) in Aotearoa New Zealand.” They found that the COVID vaccines are indistinguishable from placebo (no statistically significant results in 11 of the 12 AESIs studied), except that there was a safety signal for myo/pericarditis which was 25.6X higher than expected in the 5-19 age group after Dose 2.

A 25.6X higher rate of myocarditis in kids is an insane safety signal. What does our CDC do about it? They recommend everyone get the shot. And top universities like Harvard require the COVID shots if you want to attend classes there as a student (faculty and staff are exempted because that’s how “science” works).

Here are the rates of myocarditis from the literature.

  1. Faksova (99 million study): 10 per M doses (vaccine); 40 per M infections (virus)
  2. Patone study: Up to 35 excess events per M doses which was same as virus on unvaccinated person; claims 23 cases per M infections for virus on vaccinated person.
  3. Walton (NZ study): Up to an additional 50 cases per M doses caused by the vaccine (a 25.6X increase over expected for 5-19 year olds)
  4. Mansanguan (Thailand): 1 in 301 13-18 year olds had confirmed myocarditis post vaccine. But more important was “Cardiovascular manifestations were found in 29.24% of patients, ranging from tachycardia or palpitation to myopericarditis.” So now we are at 3,322 cases per M doses which is 66X higher than the NZ study.
  5. Mueller (Switzerland): 22 out of 777 had myocardial injury after the booster shot in this study by Professor Christian Mueller in Switzerland. That’s a 2.8% rate of myocardial injury for the general population which is 800X higher than that observed from passive measurement systems.

Bottom line: Nearly 3 in 100 people experience measurable cardiac injury after the shots.

A cardiologist who I talked to who keeps a low-profile and wants to keep it that way told me, “There were no increase in cases during COVID. We started seeing an uptick in April-May 2021.” He estimated a myocarditis rate of 1 in 5,000 in 15-17 year olds whereas before the vaccine it would be unmeasurable (less than 1 in 100,000). So that’s a 20X increase which is less than what the Walton study found.

In short, the risks >> non-existent benefits.

It doesn’t add up

How can there be 770 adverse events that are generating CDC safety signals and these studies are claiming that the vaccines are safe?

The New Zealand study is stunning… they only found myo/pericarditis was elevated by 25.6X; the other 11 events studied were insignificant.

They can’t both be right because they are saying different things.

Yet from Josh’s article:

  • The CDC analysis shows that the number of serious adverse events reported in less than two years for mRNA COVID-19 vaccines is 5.5 times larger than all serious reports for vaccines given to adults in the US since 2009 (~73,000 vs. ~13,000).

It’s a federal crime to make a false VAERS report. There is no benefit to the reporter to make a false VAERS report. And it’s not like the CDC did any kind of VAERS awareness campaign either.

So if the vaccine is as safe as a placebo, how do they explain all the AEs?

Confused? Watch “THE UNSEEN CRISIS” and decide for yourself whether the vaccine is “safe”

This movie is superb. Many of my friends are in it. I’m in it too!

If you are an Epoch Times subscriber, you get to watch the movie for no extra charge. Just go to this link. If you aren’t logged in, you can see the 2 minute preview… I’m featured at the end with a great quote. Use the two buttons in the upper right to login (if you already have an account) or subscribe.

You can also check out the movie’s website:

Try to get your family to watch it.

Someone is lying to you about the safety of the COVID vaccines. This movie can help you decide whether the 99 million patient study is telling you the truth or not.

This movie should be required watching for anyone thinking of getting the COVID vaccine. If you are going to have mandates (which are a bad idea in general), they should mandate people watch the film.

I don’t think anyone can watch the movie and then opt to get the COVID shot.

Summary

Read the paper. Watch the movie. Decide for yourself who is telling you the truth.

And remember: the data used in the study is NOT available to the public.

All my attempts at data transparency have been rejected. The health authorities have determined that you get better public health outcomes if you keep the public in the dark. So all my calls for data transparency fall on deaf ears. The best “ground truth” data we have is from the New Zealand data leak…and it clearly shows that the vaccine increases mortality. The critics acknowledge I’m right, but say that “it must be due to a confounder.” More on that coming up tomorrow.

Original source: https://kirschsubstack.com/p/99-million-patient-records-and-they

Categories
COVID 19 deaths and injuries

Cancer Researcher Speaks Out: HUGE Increase In Turbo Cancer Following COVID Shot

Cancer Researcher Speaks Out: HUGE Increase In Turbo Cancer Following COVID Shot

By Children’s Health Defense

Cancer Researcher Speaks Out: HUGE Increase In Turbo Cancer Following COVID Shot

What is turbo cancer, really?

After decades of involvement in cancer research, David Rasnick, Ph.D., links COVID shots to a new phenomenon known as “turbo cancer.” The “genetic injections” ravage people’s immune systems, eliminating their ability to fight off entirely benign tumors that would typically go away on their own. With devastated immune systems, harmless tumors turn into deadly diseases.

Rasnik observed that with the introduction of the COVID jabs, there has been a significant increase in cancers. What used to take years or decades for different cancers to become fatal is now taking a matter of months.

The COVID shots are causing turbo cancers that are essentially unbeatable, and it’s time to hold those responsible accountable.

Click Here To Play the Video

—————–

Original source: https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/chd-tv/events/the-chd-bus-tour/turbo-cancer-nc/

"All In" Starter Package


The Fast Start


Level 2️⃣


Level 1️⃣


Level 4️⃣ (5000 USD)


Level 3️⃣ (1500 USD)