Truth Talks are apart of the TruthGroup which also owns the fast growing censor social media platform, Truthbook.social

Categories
Lifestyle

YouTube Alternatives are Offering Big Incentives, for Content Creators to Upload to Their Platforms, not just YouTube

YouTube Alternatives are Offering Big Incentives, for Content Creators to Upload to Their Platforms, not just YouTube

By Staff Reporter

As the demand for alternatives to YouTube, grows, many are getting fed up with YouTube censoring content. Not to mention YouTube and its parent Alphabet, have been de-monetising many who post what’s considered controversial content. This can be content simply because it clashes with the Government or Western Oligarch’s twisted false narratives. Rumble, which is already valued at over $4 billion, a massive $600 million raise earlier this year, just topped the app charts, along with new social media comer “Be Real”, itself already valued at $600 million.

Rumble and also Spotify, are offering hundreds of millions to the big content creators, with Joe Rogan alone on over a $100 million dollar contract.
TruthGroup also has its own YouTube alternative that’s recently started, called TruthTube, and can be found at www.truthtube.video or it’s available via the app stores.

It’s also now stated, that it will offer its cryptocurrency, Truthcoin, which is trading around $0.20 cents on crypto exchanges, such as Azbits, to entice content creators to post on its new platforms to increase traffic, plus share ad revenues with larger influencers.

The TruthGroup is more well known for its Facebook alternative, called Truthbook.social, which soft-launched earlier this year.

It’s also just soft launched TruthTalks, to be an effective censor free Ted style Talks, and also TruthMed ( that’s true in medicine, which considering the fraud of Covid, and its deadly experimental treatments, that are killing and injuring more than the Government cares to dare admit is certainly needed), and TruthEd (a new 21st Century Modern day education system to combat the loony left indoctrination they call a school curriculum these days).

TruthTalks www.TruthTalks.live also is attracting attention with its lucrative income incentives for content creators, influencers, and internet marketers who detest censoring and wish to preserve free speech and do something to push back against the Globalist’s Totalitarian Great Reset Agenda.

TruthTalks.live is now available to the public and content creators, influencers and internet marketers to learn about its lucrative partnerships.

Categories
Lifestyle

TruthTalks Launches, to be the Censor Free Version of the Left Wing Ted Talks and Offers Content Creators, Influencers, and Internet Marketers Big Incentives to be Apart of It

TruthTalks Launches, to be the Censor Free Version of the Left Wing Ted Talks and Offers Content Creators, Influencers, and Internet Marketers Big Incentives to be Apart of It

By ANR Reporter

TruthTalks launches, to be the censor-free version of the left-wing Ted Talks, and offers content creators, influencers, and internet marketers big incentives to be a part of it.

The TruthGroup has just launched TruthTalks, to be an effective censor of Free Ted Talks, and also TruthMed (truth in medicine, considering the fraud of Covid and its deadly experimental treatments that are killing and injuring more then the Government cares to dare admit) and TruthEd (a new 21st Century Modern education to combat the loony left indoctrination they call a school curriculum these days).

TruthTalks www.TruthTalks.live also is attracting attention with its lucrative income incentives for content creators, influencers, and internet marketers who detest censoring and wish to preserve free speech and do something to push back against the Globalist’s Totalitarian Great Reset Agenda.

It discusses how one could earn $203,000 USD Pa with by partnering with TruthTalks at www.TruthTalks.live

TruthGroup also has its own YouTube alternative that’s recently started, called TruthTube, and can be found at www.truthtube.video or it’s available via the app stores.

It’s also now said it will offer its cryptocurrency, Truthcoin, which is trading around $0.20 cents on crypto exchanges such as Azbits, to entice content creators to post to increase traffic, plus share it as revenues for larger influencers.

The TruthGroup is more well known for its Facebook alternative, called Truthbook.social which soft-launched earlier this year.

Categories
Lifestyle

YouTube Alternatives Offer Big Incentives for Content Creators to Upload to Their Platforms, Not Just YouTube

YouTube Alternatives Offer Big Incentives for Content Creators to Upload to Their Platforms, Not Just YouTube

By ANR Reporter

YouTube alternatives offer big incentives for content creators to upload to their platforms, not just YouTube.

As the demand for alternatives to YouTube grows, many get fed up with YouTube censoring content. Not to mention YouTube and its parent Alphabet, de-monetising those who post what’s considered controversial content, simply because it clashes with the Government or Western Oligarchs twisted false narratives. Rumble, is already valued at over $4 billion. With a massive $600 million raise earlier this year, just topped the app charts along with new social media comer Be Real, itself already valued at $600 million.

Rumble and also Spotify, are offering hundreds of millions to the big content creator, with Joe Rogan on over a $100 million dollar contract.

TruthGroup also has its own YouTube alternative that’s recently started, called TruthTube, and can be found at www.truthtube.video or it’s available via the app stores.

It’s also now said it will offer its cryptocurrency, Truthcoin, which is trading around $0.20 cents on crypto exchanges such as Azbits, to entice content creators to post to increase traffic, plus share it as revenues for larger influencers.

The TruthGroup is more well known for its Facebook alternative, called Truthbook.social which soft-launched earlier this year.

It’s just launched TruthTalks, to be an effective censor of Free Ted Talks, as also TruthMed (truth in medicine, considering the fraud of Covid and its deadly experimental treatments that are killing and injuring more than the Government cares to dare admit) and TruthEd (a new 21st Century Modern education to combat the loony left indoctrination they call a school curriculum these days).

TruthTalks www.TruthTalks.live also is attracting attention with its lucrative income incentives for content creators, influencers, and internet marketers who detest censoring and wish to preserve free speech and do something to push back against the Globalist’s Totalitarian Great Reset Agenda.

Categories
Health

Fascists at YouTube Have Just Censored the Latest Scientific Research on Ivermectin

Fascists at YouTube Have Just Censored the Latest Scientific Research on Ivermectin

They don’t want you to know the truth that Ivermectin saves lives. They’d rather people die than for the truth to get out.

Last week, Results of a Prospective Observational Study of a Strictly Controlled Population of 88,012 Subjects showed that Regular Use of Ivermectin as Prophylaxis for COVID-19 led to a 92% Reduction in COVID-19 Mortality Rate in a Dose-Response Manner.

First thing this morning, BizNews received notification of a strike on our BizNews TV YouTube channel on account of the ivermectin panel discussion, which was taken down.

The timing appears too odd for coincidence. What may be more realistic is that the World Health Organisation, which is in close ‘cahoots’ with YouTube, is doing a sweep of all pro-ivermectin content.

The Ivermectin clampdown continues – Professor Colleen Aldous on a new study

In August 2021, BizNews conducted a panel discussion with Professor Colleen Aldous, Dr Nathi Mdladla and Dr Pinky Ngcakani – all of whom are strongly in favour of ivermectin. The discussion was published on BizNews TV on YouTube and for a year, it managed to evade the YouTube censorship police. Last week, Results of a Prospective Observational Study of a Strictly Controlled Population of 88,012 Subjects showed that Regular Use of Ivermectin as Prophylaxis for COVID-19 led to a 92% Reduction in COVID-19 Mortality Rate in a Dose-Response Manner. First thing this morning, BizNews received notification of a strike on our BizNews TV YouTube channel on account of the ivermectin panel discussion, which was taken down. The timing appears too odd for coincidence. What may be more realistic is that the World Health Organisation, which is in close ‘cahoots’ with YouTube, is doing a sweep of all pro-ivermectin content. We have republished the ivermectin panel discussion on Rumble (see below) together with a new article by Professor Colleen Aldous, which confirms the benefits of ivermectin. – Nadya Swart

 

By Professor Colleen Aldous*

Good science cannot be silenced. Recent randomised control trials have tried to silence those who know that Ivermectin has played an essential role in COVID-19 treatment. Our research team, which comprised the clinicians Dr Jacky Stone and Dr Martin Gill at the coal face of the COVID-19 pandemic, mathematicians, a biostatistician and a natural scientist, have just published findings showing why Ivermectin has been effective in some patients.

We examined data from a group of doctors in Zimbabwe who used an Ivermectin-based regimen to treat COVID-19. The data shows that blood oxygenation (SpO2) improves after administering ivermectin. Whereas many studies have looked at outcome measures such as hospitalisation or disease progression, which are often subjectively measured, we looked at SpO2, which is not open to interpretation. Normal SpO2 values are 95-97 %. The US National Institutes of Health uses a value of 93% or lower to define severe COVID-19.

The Zimbabwean story is important to tell so that our data and findings will be seen in context. At the beginning of the pandemic, the situation in Zimbabwe mirrored many across LMICs in terms of limited resources. In February 2020, when the first COVID-19 cases came through, doctors and nurses in the public sector were on strike. Zimbabwe had 17 working ventilators in the public sector and no staff. The private sector primary care doctors were at the coal face. The July 2020 COVID-19 wave overwhelmed them. Patients presented with very low SpO2s, sometimes lower than 30%. People were dying in their cars.

Collegial sharing of treatment experiences started with a WhatsApp group of doctors and nurses created to share ideas and support each other. Everyone contributed to the group. Dr Frank Douie was the first to suggest that vitamin D supplementation and aggressive anticoagulation resulted in better outcomes. They also looked abroad for current practice and became aware of the Wagstaff paper and Professor Borody discussing ending the pandemic by Christmas 2020 with zinc, doxycycline and ivermectin.

Using an Ivermectin-based regimen, Dr Martin Gill from South Africa helped clear a full 22-bed COVID-19 ward, including four critical and one end-stage patient. They lost only the latter patient. All the other 21 patients got better and went home. Dr Gill encouraged Dr Stone to add Ivermectin to their group’s protocol. To quote Dr Stone, “That night (after the discussion with Dr Gill) I wrote my first Ivermectin script, followed by two more. The deaths stopped in six hours. There were three patients in our converted staff room (converted into a makeshift COVID-19 ward) who I did not expect to survive when I left at around midnight. All three were sitting up (on oxygen) and coherent on the morning of the 8th August, 2020.”

The news was shared on the WhatsApp group, and after August 2020, when the ivermectin regimen was in use by others in the group, they had collectively lost only one out of 104 severe patients between them – a diabetic patient in a hyperglycaemic coma who could not get to a hospital for an insulin infusion.

In September and December 2020, the observations of this group of doctors were presented to other primary care doctors in Zimbabwe. The message was clear; Ivermectin-based combination therapy was working as part of sequenced multidrug therapy. Mortality dropped from 35.4% in hospitalised hypoxic patients on no treatment (remember how we were told to do nothing until you are ready for hospital?) to  <1% on early treatment, home nursing and home care.

With the shortage of facilities and equipment, doctors managed patients in their homes with blood oxygen saturations as low as 55%. For example, a nurse managed a patient saturating at under 50% on 10 litres of oxygen a minute overnight on an Ivermectin regimen while waiting for an ambulance. He recovered completely. However, many patients were treated at home without oxygen. It is this group of patients that has provided us with the valuable data we present in the peer-reviewed article.

Patients selected had an SpO2 value on intake of 51–93%, with all SpO2 values recorded and documented to have been obtained on room air (in almost every case because oxygen was not available), and at least one SpO2 value obtained within 48 hours after Ivermectin administration. There were 34 severely ill patients included. Oxygen saturations were tracked using pulse oximeters. These were provided  by the intake nurse, unless the patient already had one that the nurse deemed of reliable quality. The patient or a family member recorded readings regularly.

Below is the series of pulse oximeter readings over 3 hours for a 25 year old male patient treated on room air. They were taken on initiation of treatment, at 45 minutes, 90 minutes and 3 hours.

All but three patients had significantly increased SpO2 values (blood oxygen saturations) within 24 h after the first Ivermectin dose, and for those who like the p-value, our paired t-test had a p < 0.0000001. This is an impressive outcome for this study, and two other studies, independently carried out in Nigeria and the USA(1,2), have shown the same results. One of the tenets of good science is that results can be duplicated; it’s serendipitous for us that this has happened for our study.

Although ours is a small retrospective study, it is a real-world analysis of actual data that must contribute to the totality of evidence to inform evidence-based medicine. Our study employed rigorous analysis methods and should be used to inform future randomised control trials, particularly regarding effective dosages and reliable outcome measures.

This retrospective study was conducted following the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board of The Medical Research Council of Zimbabwe (Protocol Code E293, 23 June 2021). With further respect for the patients, additional informed consent was obtained from all participants whose records were reviewed for the study once ethics approval was granted.

Resources:
https://t.me/craigkelly/2833
https://www.biznews.com/health/2022/09/05/ivermectin-benefits

Categories
COVID 19 deaths and injuries

Australia Jab Injuries – Emily

Australia Jab Injuries – Emily

By Jab Injuries Australia


Emily, Australia

Original source: https://t.me/jabinjuriesaustralia/92

Categories
Health

Here’s How the Vaccine Is Causing Those Weird “Blood Clots”

Here’s How the Vaccine Is Causing Those Weird “Blood Clots”

By Steve Kirsch

I had a nice chat with Jessica Rose today on her Substack article about how the vaccine is causing your blood to perform unnatural acts.

Recently, Jessica Rose published a very long, but very important Substack article, “Is the spike protein acting as a prion with regard to hemoglobin molecules? And is porphyria being induced?

The short answer is yes, it appears so, according to everything we know.

Here’s a key paragraph from that article:

So the bottom line of all of this information is this: the virus infects the RBCs using spike protein via the CD147 receptor on red blood cells which causes hemolysis (rupture of the red blood cell). This causes the release of massive amounts of hemoglobin. Then the spike protein, due to its amyloidogenic peptides, triggers mis-folding of the hemoglobin into amyloid fibrils causing subsequent blood clots. The blood clots would be enhanced due to antibodies (Ag:Ab complexes).

These “rubbery” blood clots that are being pulled out of cadavers on a regular basis.

Watch this short video of John O’Looney explaining how these clots cause people to die.

What is remarkable is the medical examiner is completely missing this in their determination of the cause of death (which they leave unexplained). The embalmers find these clots. Most of them say nothing because they don’t want to lose business.

The “clots” featured in these videos are not blood at all; they are primarily amyloid proteins (thanks to analysis done by Mike Adams of clots supplied by Richard Hirschman).

The virus itself can cause this to happen, but to a much much smaller extent than the vaccine (think miniscule). The vaccine has an advantage over the virus because, unlike the virus, it deposits the spike protein all over your body very quickly after injection thanks to the polyethylene glycol which coats the lipid nanoparticles.

So if you are wondering why you just lost someone to a stroke or heart attack after their latest jab, now you know. If they died shortly after the vaccine, it was probably the vaccine that created a clot that blocked blood flow to the brain or heart.

Why isn’t the NIH funding a study looking at blood parameters before/after vaccination?

It’s very telling that there isn’t a single published study anywhere in the world that looks at d-dimer, troponin, and Heinz bodies both before and after vaccination.

There’s a reason for that:

They don’t want to know. It would immediately end the vaccine program worldwide.

However, if anyone reading this is interested in doing such a study, I’ll happily fund it in a heartbeat. Use the Contact me form and be sure to check the study with the d-dimer radio button.


Original Source: https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/heres-how-the-vaccine-is-causing

Categories
COVID 19 deaths and injuries

Vaccines Are Taking an Average of 5 Months to Kill People

Vaccines Are Taking an Average of 5 Months to Kill People

By Steve Kirsch

The CDC has been hiding the Social Security Administration death master file. I got it from a whistleblower. This shows deaths are taking 5 months from the jab to happen. This is why it’s hard to see.

Note: This article was updated on Sep 4 to incorporate the confirmation with the UK data and on Sept 5 to incorporate Tim Ellison’s work.

The key point is this:

The UK data shows statistical proof of causality of deaths (p<.001): the vaccine doses track with the excess deaths 23 weeks later. Dose dependency is key to showing causality. If no one can explain this, the precautionary principle of medicine requires any ethical society to halt the vaccines now.

Executive Summary

Many people assumed the vaccine kills you quickly (in the first two weeks) because that’s when people notice the association and report it to VAERS. This is still true; it does kill some people quickly: half of the deaths reported in VAERS are in the first few weeks.

But the keywords are “reported in VAERS.” It turns out that if we don’t have that restriction but are just wondering when most of the deaths after COVID vaccination happen, the answer is different.

Thanks to a helper who works at HHS, we can now clearly see that most of the deaths from the vaccine are happening an average of 5 months from the last dose. That is for the second dose; it may be getting shorter the more shots you get but there are arguments both ways (since there can be survivor bias). Using data from the UK, we can see more clearly that the delay time is around 23 weeks (so a bit more than 5 weeks). We’ll dive into that shortly.

This delay explains why the life insurance companies got off-the-charts all-cause mortality peaks for people under 60 in Q3 and Q4 rather than right after the shots rolled out.

The five month delay is also consistent with death reports where people are developing new aggressive cancers that are killing them over a 4 to 6 month period.

The 5 month death delay was also confirmed using only European data. That analysis was posted Aug 11, but I learned about it after I wrote this post.

So when you hear of a death from stroke, cardiac arrest, heart attack, cancer, and suicide that is happening around 5 months after vaccination, it could very well be a vaccine-related death.

The data from the Social Security Administration death master file (ages 18 to 55)

I got this chart from a whistleblower who works for HHS. This is data you are not supposed to see. The mortality increase (60% at peak) is huge. That sort of increase can only be caused by something novel that affected massive numbers of people.

There is only one possibility that fits that: the COVID vaccine.

The peak is September 9, 2021.

Daily vaccine doses administered in the US

The peak is April 12, 2021.

The peak is April 12, 2021.

Occam’s razor

The most obvious conclusion is that the vaccine takes an average of 5 months to kill people after the second dose.

The second peak in December 2021 will result in life insurance companies having spikes in Q1 and Q2 of 2022.

Here’s what UK Professor Norman Fenton said

Another analysis using only European data found the exact same 5 month delay!

An analysis posted at Chris Martenson’s site found the same 5 month delay using different source data! That is really stunning. I had no idea when I wrote my article.

Here’s the reader comment pointing this out and here’s the comment on Peak Prosperity posted August 9, 2022 which was just a few weeks before I found the same thing from the US data.

Here’s the full text of that post

What the figure shows is the “correlation coefficient” as function of a temporal delay, that is, time shift.

  • a negative time shift indicates that excess mortality is preceding the vaccination status
  • a positive time shift indicates that the administered doses precedes the excess mortality

The optimal time shift is defined as that time shift that maximizes the absolute pearson coefficient. We search for the highest, or the lowest value. The lowest value is around -0.3, while the highest value is around 0.8. Because the absolute value of the highest,+0.8, is larger than the absolute value of the lowest, +0.3, the optimal time shift is + 5 months. That is, Administered Doses precedes Excess mortality.

As Holden indeed mentioned, we do find a negative relation also when there is no shift. However, the explanatory power of +0.8 is way larger than -0.3.

The reason why I used “causes” instead of causes is that there are several characteristics of causal relations. What we tested now is “temporal precedence”. An effect can not precede the cause, plus, a cause predicts the effect better than the cause predicts the effect.

In the cause of observational causality, another important aspect is that the cause should predict the effect better than the effect predicts itself. In this case we indeed find that Excess Mortality predicts itself poorly —of course, for a time delay equal to 0, it does predict itself, for all other time delays, it has little to no explanatory power—.

From this we can conclude that, based on the data sets used, Administered Doses do cause Excess Mortality.

Of course, our “brilliant experts” are still stuck in the 19th century wrt statistical methods. I do not expect that they will be able to explain the excess mortality with their current methods, simply because 5 months is a huge time delay, and because here is typically little knowledge of observational causal methods.

About the method
The method used is based on correlations. The current state-of-the-art is based on Information Theory, but that’s too out of the ordinary for layman, and even experts, so we better not go there. When I have time in a couple of weeks I might run the information theoretical causal analytics.

About the data
As mentioned, the data sets from Holden’s sources were used. We selected only EU countries, we did not differentiate between sexes and age groups. Finally we used monthly data due to time restrictions on my side (I simply do not have time to search for, or create weekly data sets for the excess mortality).

A third analysis shows a similar delay (Spiro P. Pantazatos, PhD)

The reaction time for Dose 1 is longer than Dose 1 and 2:

Click the graph to see the analysis detail.

A fourth analysis uses UK data only and finds a 23 week lag time with very high statistical significance (John Dee)

This analysis posted in John Dee’s Almanac is the nail in the coffin for people claiming the vaccines don’t cause death.

What he found was that the number of COVID vaccine injections can explain a third of the non-COVID excess deaths 23 weeks later. That’s huge. That is causality. The p-value is p<.001.

Note that a p value of 0.1 is typically a max cutoff (for things that don’t really matter so much), p<0.05 is “normally” used, and p<0.01 when it really matters a great deal. See this article on p-values for details.

The precautionary principle of medicine says the vaccine is killing people. It should be stopped.

He writes:

The coefficient of determination drops out of the grill pan at r-square = 0.335. In plain English this means 33.5% of the variation we see in excess non-COVID death can be explained by variation in combined daily dosing at a lag of 23 weeks together with case detection rate at a lag of 2 weeks. Call that 34% and we have just over a third of excess deaths being explained by this combi boiler.

And includes this graph:

A fifth study finds a similar delay (Tim Ellison)

Tim Ellison finds two death peaks: at 7 weeks and 27 weeks post vaccine. Because the first week is 7 weeks out, the VAERS system is unlikely to see it because it is so far out.

One possible interpretation: the first peak is due to the first two doses and the second peak is due to getting the next booster. Food for thought. This may make some sense since the booster peak is lower (fewer people get the booster). Or it may just be that the vaccine has two-time constants of harm. Or it could be a combination of both!

The embalmer data gives more insights as to the cause of the double peak

I disagree with Tim about the booster.

Read this description of the embalmer data.

Those clots take a while to form and then kill you.

The vaccine has at least two major mechanisms of death. One has a short time constant and the other has a longer time constant. That’s why the embalmers didn’t notice these telltale clots until mid-2021.

An anecdote

This is interesting. It’s unlikely that there are example of both parents dying within 1 month of vax, but it’s not hard to find both parents dying around 5 months from vax:

The summer months hypothesis

Mathew Crawford speculated that the delay was the same in Europe and the US due to similar rollout schedules. He speculates that people are more active in summer and activity that raises your heart rate is more likely to trigger strokes and heart attacks in the vaccinated.

I agree that this may be a contributing factor, but I don’t know how much.

Could this be just “Delta”?

Delta started on July 1, 2021 and ended on December 15, 2021. So we’d expect more of a plateau rather than a sharp peak if it was Delta.

But we know from the Massachusetts death data obtained under a FOIA request that the cause of death in 2021 shifted to the circulatory system, rather than the respiratory system according to the analysis of the ICD10 codes associated with the death records.

In addition, the insurance companies confirmed it wasn’t COVID that was causing the excess deaths.

And then we have plenty of stories of vaccine victims dying around 5 months after the shot.

And we have the emergency study in Israel showing a 25% increase in calls between January and May, 2021. What’s interesting is that the authors of the paper were not allowed access to the same emergency call data after May, 2021 (they asked and were denied). That’s a huge red flag. COVID doesn’t cause cardiac issues. And the drug companies are trying to get that paper retracted.

And now we have the disclosure that the Israeli Ministry of Health deliberately withheld vaccine safety data from the people of Israel. It seems the vaccine isn’t as safe as the told people. So when they found that out, they manipulated the data to make it look safe and released the manipulated report, something that is clearly illegal and unethical. The mainstream press refused to cover the story.

So the evidence seems more consistent with vaccine deaths than COVID deaths.

Alternate hypotheses

If someone has a better explanation for this data, I’d love to hear it.

It does appear from reading the comments that it makes sense to reader and explains what they personally observed.

If any fact checker wants to challenge me on this, you can use the Contact Form and let’s have a recorded conversation.

The CDC doesn’t want to talk about this. They also won’t tell us why they aren’t showing us this data.

For sure, the NY Times and rest of the mainstream media will ignore this and won’t ask any questions. Maybe Tucker Carlson will talk about it.

Implications for the Canadian doctor death data

Armed with this new knowledge, we should stop looking just for deaths proximate to the vaccine and look at the overall death rate in Canada of young doctors, e.g., doctors 50 and younger. What I found when I did that is that the number of young doctor deaths in Canada increased by a factor of 2.5X in 2021 vs. 2020 (15 deaths vs. 6). I’ve requested the data for earlier years to see how this compares

Summary

It was wrong to assume that most of the vaccine-related deaths were happening shortly after vaccination. Some are, but most are not. It’s just that they were easier to notice when there was temporal proximity to the jabs.


Original Source: https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/this-one-graph-tells-you-everything

Categories
COVID 19 deaths and injuries

COVID Vaccine Injury Data: 143,233 Percent Increase in Cancer

COVID Vaccine Injury Data: 143,233 Percent Increase in Cancer

By Dan Skorbach

When something goes wrong inside a cell’s DNA, the cell fires a signal that tells other cells, “I’ve gone bad. Please kill me.”

This early warning helps the immune system stop cancer cells from multiplying. It stops a virus from replicating. So it’s a very important early response tool that works across the whole body.

Recent studies suggest that COVID-19 vaccines may be damaging this early warning system, and fundamentally, they’re changing how our immune system reacts to cancer cells and new infections. We still don’t know if that’s a temporary change.

On Frontline Health, we share a story of a perfectly healthy man who developed stage 3 esophageal cancer five months after taking his second dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. His wife believes it was the jab that spiraled her husband’s health out of control. Her suspicions are supported by a huge spike in cancers that have been reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) since the start of COVID-19 vaccinations. Meanwhile, doctors on the ground are seeing the same spikes of cancer diagnosis in their patients.

Click Here To Play Video


Original Source: https://www.theepochtimes.com/covid-vaccine-injury-data-143233-percent-increase-in-cancer_4699328.html

Categories
Health

New Study & Pfizer Documents Prove COVID Vaccine Shedding Has Been Occurring With Shocking Consequences

New Study & Pfizer Documents Prove COVID Vaccine Shedding Has Been Occurring With Shocking Consequences

The findings should however come as no surprise because a confidential Pfizer document had already confirmed exposure to the mRNA injections was perfectly possible by skin-to-skin contact and breathing the same air as someone who had been given the Covid-19 jab.

New Study & Pfizer Documents prove COVID Vaccine Shedding has been occurring with shocking consequences

A new study conducted by scientists at the University of Colorado confirms the vast majority of humanity has had absolutely no choice in the matter of whether they wish to get the Covid-19 injection or not because the vaccinated have been transmitting antibodies generated by the injections through aerosols.

The findings should however come as no surprise because a confidential Pfizer document had already confirmed exposure to the mRNA injections was perfectly possible by skin-to-skin contact and breathing the same air as someone who had been given the Covid-19 jab.

They also, unfortunately, add weight to the claims made by Dr Phillipe van Welbergen, who demonstrated that graphene, an alleged undisclosed ingredient of the Covid-19 injections, is being transmitted from the vaccinated to the not-vaccinated and destroying red blood cells and causing dangerous blood clots.

The latest study, titled ‘Evidence for Aerosol Transfer of SARS-CoV2-specific Humoral Immunity’, and published 1st May 2022, was conducted by the following scientists for the University of Colorado –

  • Ross M. Kedl, Elena Hsieh,
  • Thomas E. Morrison,
  • Gabriela Samayoa-Reyes,
  • Siobhan Flaherty,
  • Conner L. Jackson,
  • Rosemary Rochford.

The abstract of the study reads as follows –

Despite the obvious knowledge that infectious particles can be shared through respiration, whether other constituents of the nasal/oral fluids can be passed between hosts has surprisingly never even been postulated, let alone investigated.

The circumstances of the present pandemic facilitated a unique opportunity to fully examine this provocative idea. The data we show provides evidence for a new mechanism by which herd immunity may be manifested, the aerosol transfer of antibodies between immune and non-immune hosts.

And here are the study authors’ main findings –

The extended mandates for mask wearing in both social and work environments provided a unique opportunity to evaluate the possibility of aerosolized antibody expiration from vaccinated individuals.

Utilizing a flow cytometry-based Multiplex Microsphere Immunoassay (MMIA) to detect SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies (Fig 1A and B) 4,5 and a method previously used to elute antibody from rehydrated dried blood spots (DBS), we identified anti-SARS-CoV-2 specific antibodies eluted from surgical face masks worn by vaccinated lab members donated at the end of one workday.

Consistent with the results reported by others, we identified both IgG and IgA in saliva from vaccinated individuals (Fig 1C and D). It was therefore not surprising to detect both IgG and IgA following elution of antibody from face masks (Fig 1C and D).

Given these observations, we hypothesized that droplet/aerosolized antibody transfer might occur between individuals, much like droplet/aerosolized virus particles can be exchanged by the same route.

This means Covid-19 vaccine shedding is perfectly possible when we take into account a study performed on behalf of Pfizer in Japan.

The study observed the distribution of the Covid-19 injection in the bodies of Wister Rats over a period of 48 hours. One of the most concerning findings from the study is the fact that the Pfizer injection accumulates in the ovaries over time. The highest concentration was noted in the liver. But it also accumulates in the salivary glands on the skin.

It is not known if the injection continues to accumulate after 48 hours due to observations being stopped after this amount of time in the study. But these results coupled with the first study above tell us that for a minimum of 48 hours, an unvaccinated person is at risk of being exposed to the Covid-19 injection if they breathe the same air as or touch the skin of a person who has been vaccinated.

This should however come as no surprise because Pfizer admitted as much in their ‘A PHASE 1/2/3, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, RANDOMIZED, OBSERVER-BLIND, DOSE-FINDING STUDY TO EVALUATE THE SAFETY, TOLERABILITY, IMMUNOGENICITY, AND EFFICACY OF SARS-COV-2 RNA VACCINE CANDIDATES AGAINST COVID-19 IN HEALTHY INDIVIDUALS’ document.

The document contains a whole section covering the possibility of ‘mRNA vaccine shedding’ in which it is possible for those who have been in close proximity to someone who has had the Pfizer mRNA jab to suffer an adverse reaction.

Section 8.3.5 of the document, it describes how exposure during pregnancy or breastfeeding to the Pfizer mRNA jab during the trials should be reported to Pfizer Safety within 24 hours of investigator awareness. This is strange because pregnant women / new mothers were and are not part of the safety trials. So how can they be exposed?

Well, Pfizer confirms that exposure during pregnancy can occur if a female is found to be pregnant and is environmentally exposed to the vaccine during pregnancy. The document states that environmental exposure during pregnancy can occur if a female family member or healthcare provider reports that she is pregnant after having been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact. Or if a male family member of a healthcare provider who has been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact then exposes his female partner prior to or around the time of conception.

In Layman’s terms, Pfizer is admitting in this document that it is possible to expose another human being to the mRNA Covid vaccine just by breathing the same air or touching the skin of the person who has been vaccinated.

All of this makes the findings of Dr. Philippe van Welbergen all the more concerning.

Dr. Philippe van Welbergen (“Dr. Philippe”), Medical Director of Biomedical Clinics, was one of the first to warn the public of the damage being caused to people’s blood by Covid injections by releasing images last year of blood samples under the microscope.

At the beginning of July 2021, Dr. Philippe, was interviewed and explained that when his patients started complaining about chronic fatigue, dizziness, memory issues, even sometimes paralysis and late onset of heavy menstruation (women in their 60s upwards), he took blood samples.

Their blood had unusual tube-like structures, some particles which lit up and many damaged cells. Few healthy cells were visible. Until three months earlier, he had never seen these formations in blood.

Then in February 2022, Dr. Philippe presented images of his latest blood slides and explained what the images show. His slides show that vaccine-free patients have been “infected” with vaccine toxins through shedding, including what is claimed to be graphene.

A full review of his slides can be viewed here. But here’s a short clip of his presentation –

What Dr. Philippe van Welbergen demonstrated is that the graphene being injected into people is organising and growing into larger fibres and structures, gaining magnetic properties or an electrical charge and the fibres are showing indications of more complex structures with striations.

He also demonstrated that “shards” of graphene are being transmitted from “vaccinated” to vaccine-free or unvaccinated people destroying their red blood cells and causing blood clots in the unvaccinated.

It would appear there was never any need to waste an extortionate amount of taxpayers’ money on propaganda to coerce the public into getting the Covid-19 injections. Because the taxpayer never had a choice in the matter. All they had to do was breathe.

Resources:
https://t.me/zeeemedia/6460
https://expose-news.com/2022/09/03/study-pfizer-documents-confirm-shedd-ing/

Categories
Health

I Never Saw Cancer in Anyone Unvaccinated “Says a Doctor in 1936 and by Many Doctors Since

I Never Saw Cancer in Anyone Unvaccinated “Says a Doctor in 1936 and by Many Doctors Since

Telegram Post By Jamie McIntyre

“I never saw cancer in anyone unvaccinated, “Says a Doctor in 1936 and by many Doctors since. I wonder if people knew the Rockefeller Foundation created vaccines as a population control measure and used vaccines as the way for the deadly cancer viruses they had created in labs, injected into humans, knowing full well it may not kill them straight away, but 20-30-40 years later almost everyone will drop dead of cancer, but they will never link it to the vaccines, and other poisons pushed upon the innocent and gullible. The Covid jab the deadliest one ever invented is speeding the cycle up, and that’s why many die in a short time after the jab. But with their mass media propaganda, they will create names like SADs after creating names such as SIDs to cover up humans dropping dead for no known reason. The reason is known and it was always done deliberately.

Click Here To Play Video

Read more:
https://truthbook.social/post/150107_i-never-saw-cancer-in-anyone-unvaccinated-says-a-doctor-in-1936-and-by-many-doc.html


Original Source: https://t.me/jamiemcintyre/5307

"All In" Starter Package


The Fast Start


Level 2️⃣


Level 1️⃣


Level 4️⃣ (5000 USD)


Level 3️⃣ (1500 USD)